Source Title: several media in the United States disclosed that hospitals in many places gave priority to the new crown vaccine to “related households”
, governor of Washington State Jay middleley, has criticized the practice. After receiving a call from the governor’s aide, the hospital shut down its online registration system for invitees only and apologized. Seattle mayor Jennie decanze urged the state government to review the vaccination policy to ensure that the most vulnerable people, especially the people of color, are given priority to vaccination, and to prevent hospitals from jumping in the queue. In addition, according to the US media, there are local hospitals in San Francisco, California and Kansas, where Council members, finance committee members, fund-raising committee members and other front-line medical staff are vaccinated with the new crown vaccine. The court explained that the priority of vaccination for these people was “due to work needs”;. 
two hospitals in Rhode Island were also exposed to give priority to vaccination to some members of the hospital Council. One hospital gave the reason that the hospital was allowed to vaccinate employees and volunteers with low risk of infection, and the members of the Council were & lt; volunteers & gt;. Rhode Island state prosecutors are now investigating whether the two hospitals have improper practices. 
, an American Medical Ethics scholar, pointed out that giving priority to vaccination to “related users” in hospitals would undermine the American public’s confidence in the fair distribution of vaccines. &”It makes people think that if you have money, connections and means, you can get what others can’t get. Vaccination is a living example. ”In the novel coronavirus pneumonia, the new crown vaccine belongs to &ldquo, the scarce resource &rdquo, and the distribution is very confusing.
Recently, a number of media in the United States have exposed that some hospitals give priority to vaccination to the hospital’s senior management and “related households.”.
According to the Seattle Times, a hospital in Seattle, Washington, sent e-mails to more than 100 “funders” who donated more than $10000, telling them that they could make an appointment for vaccination, with a password that was only used by the invited person to register. At the same time, the hospital’s online public appointment system, registered vaccination has been scheduled to the end of March.
Jay ingsley, governor of Washington state, has criticized the practice. After receiving a call from the governor’s aide, the hospital shut down its online registration system for invitees only and apologized.
Seattle mayor Jennie decanze urged the state government to review the vaccination policy to ensure that the most vulnerable people, especially the people of color, are given priority to vaccination, and to prevent hospitals from jumping in the queue.
In addition, according to the US media, there are local hospitals in San Francisco, California and Kansas, where Council members, finance committee members, fund-raising committee members and other front-line medical staff are vaccinated with the new crown vaccine. The court explained that the priority of vaccination for these people was “due to work needs”;.
Two hospitals in Rhode Island have also been exposed to give priority to vaccination to some members of the hospital Council. One hospital gave the reason that the hospital was allowed to vaccinate employees and volunteers with lower risk of infection, and the members of the Council were “volunteers”;.
Rhode Island state prosecutors are now investigating whether the two hospitals have improper practices.
Some American Medical Ethics scholars pointed out that giving priority to vaccination to “related users” of hospitals would undermine the confidence of the American public in the fair distribution of vaccines. &”It makes people think that if you have money, connections and means, you can get what others can’t get. Vaccination is a living example. ”