Source Title: US media: Asia has three advantages in becoming a winner of anti epidemic
Novel coronavirus pneumonia, February 1st, 27, the US foreign policy focus research plan website, entitled “how to explain the difference between the East and the West in the new crown pneumonia epidemic”? 》The author of this paper is John & middot; Pfeiffer. The excerpts are as follows
The novel coronavirus pneumonia is a relentless choice of winners and losers all over the world.
The obvious losers are countries led by right-wing nationalists: Brazil, India, Britain and the United States.
It is also obvious that the & quot; winners & quot; are Asian countries. Both China and South Korea managed to recover quickly. At the same time, the adverse effects on other countries in the region are far less severe than those in Europe or the Americas. Even the less fortunate countries in the region have managed the pandemic better than the West.
It’s easy to blame trump for the sad gap between the United States and Asia. Governance failure seems to be the key differentiator, but many Asian governments have made similar mistakes. So perhaps at least part of the fault lies elsewhere: not in our political stars, but in ourselves.
The East values harmony, order and common interests rather than turbulent democracy, destructive human rights and overwhelming personality worship.
Today, the novel coronavirus pneumonia sets a clear line between Asia and the rest of the world. Successful Asian countries and regions have very different regimes. In addition, they have different historical and religious backgrounds and different relations with western countries.
First, Asian countries novel coronavirus pneumonia with a more serious attitude and achieved good results.
The second advantage of Asian countries is the coordinated response of the central government. Beijing soon made every effort to curb the spread of the epidemic, blockaded Wuhan and other hot spots in time, and strictly restricted domestic travel. South Korea moved quickly to establish a nationwide detection and tracking system. Countries in the region (Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia) with less tightly knit federal structures cannot respond so quickly or continuously, but they are also models of central authority compared with countries such as Brazil and the United States. In Brazil, the United States and other countries, the policy conflict between the center and the periphery has seriously increased the difficulty of taking pandemic response measures.
The third advantage is the issue of obedience, which is closest to the argument of “Oriental values”. For example, America’s anti mask complex is hard to find in Asia. Throughout Asia, citizens are more respectful of scientific authority and abide by common ethical standards. As novel coronavirus pneumonia published in the new Yorker weekly, Laurence ·, Wright pointed out that sticking to wearing masks is a decisive factor in successfully controlling the spread of viruses.
Anti vaccine sentiment in Asia is also quite low. A survey in 2018 showed that 85% of Asians thought the vaccine was safe, the highest in all regions of the world.
The West needs to take a closer look at its values, which are clearly not suitable for achieving goals in times of crisis.